Let’s take a look at the differences between Chinese and Japanese. There are word order free languages and word order fixed languages in the world, but most languages are located midway between them. For example Latin is word order free and Chinese is word order fixed. Japanese word order is also almost free.
When viewed from typology, Germanic languages like German and Dutch are also partially free. Chinese word order is type SVO (Subject-Verb-Object) and Japanese and German word order is type SOV. In order to represent the grammatical relation, Chinese depends on word order and Japanese and Korean use particles.
Therefore Chinese is an isolating language and Japanese is called an agglutinative language. In fact Chinese word order is similar to English, but Chinese has no inflection and conjugation. Type SOV languages, such as Japanese, account for approximately half of the languages in the world type SVO, such as English and Chinese, accounts for 35％, and type VSO, such as Polynesian, accounts for more than 10％.
　The difference in word order has an influence on the linguistic abduction. As in Chinese the predicate comes shortly after the subject, it is quickly obvious whether the intention of the speaker or writer is positive or negative. On the other hand, in Japanese the predicate comes at the end and therefore it is only clear at the last moment whether the intention of the speaker or writer is positive or negative.
　Sapir explained that such thought style really describes linguistic habits. The hypothesis which he established with his disciple Whorf is still handed down. When one considers the translation between Chinese and Japanese, an inference is also an important point as well as word order.
　In general, a logical abductive inference is seen in a discovery and an invention, but when one writes a sentence, a small abduction is situated among word order, paragraph and a flow of words. The abduction is different in arts and science and the way to build something is also different in them. Synergy is necessary to adjust the difference and therefore it is the real origin of abduction.
The grammatical processing called affixation has three types; prefixes, suffixes, and infixes. Suffixes are the commonest. Sapir explained that Chinese is a language that doesn’t have an independent value for radical elements. But, the Japanese affix “teki” may be influenced by Chinese “de” and “zi” as in “háizi (children)” and “beizi (glass)”, which are also examples of Chinese affixation.
　Chinese accent is pitch accent as well as Japanese, but it is more complicated. For example Chinese alternation such as “fa” level middle and “fa” level falling explains that tonal differences don’t necessarily separate verbs from nouns. The grammatical internal modification is the process to change a vowel or a consonant inside a word. Japanese verbs and adjectives have such conjugation, but Chinese doesn’t have it. Therefore Chinese doesn’t have any example similar to English vocalic change (sing, sang, sung, song).

花村嘉英著（2015）「从认知语言学的角度浅析鲁迅作品－魯迅をシナジーで読む」より translated by Yoshihisa Hanamura